Legal 60

Khaitan & Co Advised Vantris Energy Berhad on Divestment from L&T-Sapura Shipping The leading law firm in India, Khaitan & Co advised Vantris Energy Berhad on the divestment of its entire equity stake in L&T-Sapura Shipping (owner and operator of the LTS3000 heavy-lift and pipelay vessel) to its joint-venture partner, Larsen & Toubro Limited. This

Baker McKenzie Cairo Advised Marakez on EGP 3 Billion Bilateral Facility to Support Expansion of District 5’s Mindhaus Campus The global law firm, Baker McKenzie Cairo advised Marakez, one of Egypt’s leading mixed‑use real estate developers, acting as borrower’s counsel, on securing a landmark EGP 3 billion bilateral facility from Kuwait Finance House — Egypt.

The Supreme Court of India’s decision in Hemalatha (D) by Legal Representatives v. Tukaram (D) by Legal Representatives & Others Civil Appeal No. 6640 of 2010, serves as a landmark pronouncement on the threshold required to invalidate registered property deeds. The Appeal was decided by the Two Judge Bench comprising Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice

In a constitutional democracy governed by the rule of law, the enforceability of subordinate legislation depends not only on the authority under which it is made but also on the manner in which it is brought into existence. Executive notifications, rules, and orders can impose serious civil and economic consequences, yet their legitimacy hinges on

IntroductionThe Supreme Court of India’s Judgment in Practical Solutions Inc. v. The State of Telangana & Others (Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 953 of 2026, decided on January 19, 2026) addresses a critical dimension of criminal procedure, the necessity of affording parties a meaningful opportunity to present their case before adjudication. The matter was heard

Indian Supreme Court’s decision in Neha Lal v. Abhishek Kumar (2026) raises a profound and uncomfortable question for the contemporary justice system: have matrimonial disputes transformed courts into battlefields rather than forums of reconciliation? The judgment goes beyond resolving a bitter marital conflict. It reflects a broader judicial concern over the growing tendency of estranged

INTRODUCTIONThe Supreme Court of India, in Viraj Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, reported as 2026 INSC 80, delivered a constitutionally significant ruling on 21 January 2026, clarifying when delegated legislation acquires the force of law. The Judgment was rendered by a Division Bench comprising Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe.At the

Khaitan & Co Represents Senior Management of Prominent Hospitality Group in Section 9 Arbitration Petition The leading law firm in India, Khaitan & Co successfully advised and represented the senior management of a prominent hospitality group (“Clients”) in a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Section 9 Petition”). The

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas advised Bessemer Venture Partners on investment in Sukino Healthcare Solutions The leading law firm in India, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas (CAM) advised Bessemer Venture Partners on its investment in Sukino Healthcare Solutions Private Limited, a home healthcare and assisted living services provider.The deal invovled a primary investment and a secondary purchase from existing

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas advised QSR Asia and Restaurant Brands Asia on acquisition of controlling stake by Lenexis Foodworks The leading law firm in India, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas (CAM) is acting as legal counsel to QSR Asia Pte. Ltd. and Restaurant Brands Asia Limited (“Company”) in relation to the acquisition of a controlling interest in the