“A Tale of Two Countries”. That is how the Delhi HC Division Bench (“DB”) described the judgment dated 18th March 2026 in the Appeal by the Embassy of Peru against the July 2025 Pisco decision by Justice Mini Pushkarna. Extensively covered on our blog previously, in travelling through the IPAB and the Delhi HC, the
... Continue Reading.PREMATURE REJECTION, DENIED JUSTICE: REVISITING ORDER VII RULE 11
INTRODUCTION In M/s. Marg Limited v. Sushil Lalwani & Ors. (decided on 21 April 2026), the Supreme Court of India, speaking through Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Alok Aradhe, examined the scope of rejection of Plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Judgment arose from an Order of
... Continue Reading.IBC MECHANISM NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR DECREE EXECUTION OR RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court in Anjani Technoplast Ltd. v. Shubh Gautam, 2026 INSC 410, on April 23, 2026, comprising of a Division Bench of Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe. clarifying whether a decree-holder can invoke insolvency proceedings as a substitute for execution of a civil court decree. BRIEF FACTS The Respondent, a
... Continue Reading.MAINTENANCE FOR CHILD CANNOT BE DEMANDED FROM A MAN IF A DNA TEST SHOWS HE IS NOT THE FATHER
INTRODUCTION In Nikhat Parveen @ Khusboo Khatoon v. Rafique @ Shillu, 2026 INSC 399, decided on 21 April 2026, the Supreme Court of India, comprising of Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh observed a crucial principle related to whether a child born during marriage could claim maintenance when a DNA test negated
... Continue Reading.SUPPRESSION OF MATERIAL FACTS JUSTIFIES REVOCATION OF PROBATE: SUPREME COURT RESTORES TRIAL COURT’S ORDER
INTRODUCTION In S. Leorex Sebastian & Anr. v. Sarojini & Ors., 2026 INSC 400, decided on 21 April 2026, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice Vipul M. Pancholi, examined the scope of revocation of probate under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The Court held that where probate is obtained by
... Continue Reading.FROM CONVICTION TO ACQUITTAL: THE ROLE OF RELIABLE EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL LAW
INTRODUCTION In The State of Assam v. Moinul Haque@ Monu (decided on 16 April 2026), the Supreme Court of India, speaking through Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, decided by the Supreme Court of India, marks a significant reiteration of the principles governing circumstantial evidence and the limits of appellate review. The Bench, while examining
... Continue Reading.SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS LIFE SENTENCE ON THE BASIS OF SINGLE CREDIBLE WITNESS
INTRODUCTION In Adalat Yadav & Anr. v. State of Bihar, 2026 INSC 403, decided on 22 April 2026, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, reaffirmed a settled but often contested principle of criminal law: a conviction can be sustained on the testimony of a single witness, provided
... Continue Reading.World IP Day 2026 Celebrated by Indian Law Institute and Jamia Hamdard with Focus on ‘IP & Sports’
World Intellectual Property Day 2026 was jointly celebrated by the Indian Law Institute (ILI) in collaboration with the Hamdard Institute of Legal Studies & Research, Jamia Hamdard, through a thought-provoking panel discussion on the theme “IP & Sports: Ready, Set, Innovate.” The programme brought together distinguished academicians, legal practitioners, and students to deliberate on the
... Continue Reading.Juris Prime Law Services Appoints Nitin Bhuwania As Partner To Lead Corporate & Commercial Practice
Juris Prime Law Services Appoints Nitin Bhuwania as Partner to Lead Corporate & Commercial Practice The prominent full-service law firm in India, Juris Prime Law Services has announced the appointment of Nitin Bhuwania as Partner, where he will lead the firm’s Corporate & Commercial Practice. Nitin Bhuwania brings extensive experience across corporate law, transactions, finance,
... Continue Reading.NCLAT Reserves Verdict on Vedanta’s Challenge to Adani’s JAL Resolution Plan, Examines Limits of CoC’s Commercial Wisdom vs Value Maximisation
NCLAT Reserves Verdict on Vedanta’s Challenge to Adani’s JAL Resolution Plan, Examines Limits of CoC’s Commercial Wisdom vs Value Maximisation Introduction The present matter, Vedanta Limited vs Adani Enterprises Limited (JAL Resolution Plan Appeal), is pending before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), where a Bench comprising Chairperson Ashok Bhushan and Technical Member Braun
... Continue Reading.