DNLU Jabalpur & Bharatiya Shikshan Mandal Host Panel on Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, 2025

Jabalpur, 7 February 2026 — Dharmashastra National Law University (DNLU), Jabalpur, in collaboration with Bharatiya Shikshan Mandal (Mahakaushal Prant), successfully organised a high-level panel discussion on the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, 2025 at the BRBRAITT Campus, Ridge Road, South Civil Lines, Jabalpur. The event brought together eminent academicians, policymakers, and education leaders to deliberate

... Continue Reading.

SUPREME COURT HOLDS ARREST UNDER BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA MUST BE BASED ON FRESH MATERIAL NOT ON GROUNDS IN S.35(3) NOTICE

In a landmark Judgment in the case titled Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation (MA NO.2034 OF 2022, that strengthens protections for personal liberty, the Supreme Court of India has tightened the framework governing police arrests under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.The Court has held that if police seek to arrest

... Continue Reading.

CONSENSUAL RELATIONSHIPS CANNOT BE CRIMINALISED AS RAPE; FALSE PROMISE OF MARRIAGE REQUIRES LEGAL POSSIBILITY AND FRAUD AT INCEPTION

INTRODUCTIONIn Pramod Kumar Navratna v. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors., 2026 INSC 124, decided on 5 February 2026, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, delivered a crucial Judgment drawing a firm constitutional and criminal law boundary between genuine sexual offences and consensual relationships that subsequently turn acrimonious.The Court

... Continue Reading.

POWER OF REVIEW NOT INHERENT; EXECUTIVE AUTHORITIES CANNOT REOPEN CONCLUDED QUASI-JUDICIAL ORDERS

INTRODUCTIONIn State of West Bengal & Ors. v. Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd., 2026 INSC 132, the Supreme Court of India, speaking through Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, delivered a constitutionally significant ruling restraining executive authorities from reopening long-concluded quasi-judicial decisions in the absence of express statutory authority.The Judgment categorically holds that the power of review is

... Continue Reading.

ROAD RAGE DE-ESCALATION: STRATEGIES FOR STAYING SAFE WHEN TEMPERS FLARE

In the practice of law, regardless of jurisdiction, we observe a common pattern in vehicular disputes: what begins as a minor traffic infraction often escalates into significant criminal and civil liability. Whether navigating the interstate highways or the arterial roads, the legal principles governing human conduct remain remarkably consistent.Road rage is not merely a lapse

... Continue Reading.

STATUTORY AUTHORITIES MUST STEP IN WHEN HOUSING SOCIETY STALLS MEMBERSHIP; TENANCY HISTORY CANNOT DEFEAT COOPERATIVE RIGHTS

INTRODUCTIONIn Shashin Patel & Anr. v. Uday Dalal & Ors., 2026 INSC 125, decided on 5 February 2026, the Supreme Court of India, speaking through a Bench comprising Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta, delivered an important ruling on the rights of flat occupants to cooperative society membership and the extent of supervisory powers

... Continue Reading.

LEASING A RESIDENTIAL FLAT DOES NOT DEFEAT CONSUMER STATUS; DOMINANT PURPOSE TEST REAFFIRMED

INTRODUCTIONIn Vinit Bahri and Another v. M/s MGF Developers Ltd. and Another, reported as 2026 INSC 114, the Supreme Court of India, by a Judgment dated 4 February 2026, delivered an important pronouncement on the scope of the term “consumer” under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Bench comprising Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice

... Continue Reading.

Design Law Reforms: Searching for Justifications

Long post ahead! PIIT on 23rd January 2026 had put out a concept note titled “Proposed Amendments to the Designs Act, 2000” and has invited comments from stakeholders, with the last day for submitting comments being 22nd February 2026. Some reforms are substantive, affecting the scope of design law. While others are administrative, intended to

... Continue Reading.