Legal 60

School of Law, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru is inviting applications for its Five-Day Faculty Development Programme (Hybrid) on “Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Legal Education: Pedagogical Innovations, Research Frontiers and Professional Applications”. About the Programme The School of Law, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, is pleased to invite applications for a Five-Day Faculty Development Programme (FDP) on

School of Law, Bennett University is inviting submissions for its International Conference on “Constitutionalism and Sustainable Development Goals: Ensuring Governance & Rule of Law in India’s Transformative Journey”, scheduled to be held from 21–23 November 2026 in Hybrid Mode at Bennett University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. About the Event The Centre for Constitutional Law and

Brussels, Belgium | 22 June 2026 : The Centre for Indo-European Cooperation (CIEC), Brussels, successfully hosted a high-level international dialogue on “Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Judicial Functioning”, bringing together eminent judges, diplomats, legal scholars, policymakers, researchers, and technology experts from India and Europe to deliberate on the future of justice in

The Madras High Court’s decision in Sheefa Rani v. Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu & Ors., W.P.Crl. Nos. 722 of 2025, dated 19 June 2026, is a significant intervention in prison jurisprudence in Tamil Nadu because it addresses a recurring and practical question: can a convict whose appeal is pending still be granted ordinary

The Delhi High Court has reiterated that judicial review remains available where the official answer key of a competitive examination contains manifestly incorrect or demonstrably unacceptable answers, emphasising that such a challenge is fundamentally different from seeking re-evaluation of answer sheets. In Bisen Anshul Kumar v. Union of India & Anr. (W.P.(C) 7786/2026), the Division

In a significant judgment reaffirming the constitutional scheme governing Scheduled Castes, the Allahabad High Court has held that neither courts nor State Governments possess the authority to alter, expand, or reinterpret the Scheduled Castes list notified under Article 341 of the Constitution of India. The Court emphasised that any inclusion or exclusion from the Scheduled

Marriage is often described as a lifelong partnership built on companionship, mutual respect, emotional support, and shared responsibilities. However, when spouses remain separated for decades with no meaningful interaction, no intention to reunite, and prolonged litigation replacing marital companionship, an important legal question emerges: should the law continue to preserve such a relationship merely because

The Kerala High Court dismissed a criminal appeal filed by two accused persons seeking anticipatory bail in a case involving allegations of caste-based abuse, criminal intimidation, trespass, and use of explosive substances. The Court held that once the materials on record disclose a prima facie offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

The Himachal Pradesh High Court’s decision in Rajesh Kakar v. State of Himachal Pradesh & another is a significant reaffirmation of a principle that courts across India have increasingly emphasised in corruption prosecutions: mere delay in investigation, without demonstrable prejudice and without collapse of the prosecution’s foundational material, is not by itself a sufficient ground