The judgment serves as a vital reminder of the intersection between statutory obligations and constitutional rights, emphasizing the State’s duty to safeguard human lives. Title of the Case: S. Rajaseekaran v. Union of India & Ors. (2025) Citation: Writ Petition (C) No. 295 of 2012 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Justice Abhay S. Oka
... Continue Reading.CLAT PG 2025 Solved Paper | CLAT PG Entrance Solved Papers PDF
Find CLAT PG 2025 Solved Paper on Legal Bites. Owing to the increasing competition day by day, getting into your dream college is not that easy. Practice the CLAT PG past year paper to reflect on your preparation and increase your knowledge with the correct information. Practice makes a man perfect and thus, solving the
... Continue Reading.Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Decision in Land Ownership Dispute
Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Decision in Land Ownership Dispute The Judgment in the Case of M/s Maxim India Integrated Circuit Design (P) Ltd. Versus Andappa (D) By LRs &Ors.(Civil Appeal Nos. 3650-3655 of 2018, with Civil Appeal No. 3656 of 2018) was delivered by a Division Bench of the Supreme Court of India, comprising
... Continue Reading.SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES THAT A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF CRIMINAL INTIMIDATION REQUIRES A CLEAR DEMONSTRATION OF INTENT, SUBSTANTIATED BY EVIDENCE ON RECORD
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES THAT A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF CRIMINAL INTIMIDATION REQUIRES A CLEAR DEMONSTRATION OF INTENT, SUBSTANTIATED BY EVIDENCE ON RECORD A division-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice C.T. Ravikumar and Justice Sanjay Karol passed a Judgment dated 02-01-2025 in the matter of Naresh Aneja @ Naresh Kumar Aneja vs. State
... Continue Reading.Analysis of the Supreme Court Judgment in Lilian Coelho & Ors. v. Myra Philomena Coalho
Analysis of the Supreme Court Judgment in Lilian Coelho & Ors. v. Myra Philomena Coalho Introduction The Supreme Court judgment (Division Bench) in Civil Appeal No. 7198 of 2009 addresses a critical testamentary dispute involving a Will executed by Mrs. Maria Francisca Coelho. The case highlights the interplay between valid execution and the genuineness of
... Continue Reading.Supreme Court Upholds CBI Jurisdiction and State Consent Post-Bifurcation of State
Supreme Court Upholds CBI Jurisdiction and State Consent Post-Bifurcation of State Introduction On January 2, 2025, the Supreme Court of India delivered a judgment (Division Bench) in The State, Central Bureau of Investigation V. A. Satish Kumar & Ors. 2025 INSC 11 by addressing crucial questions of jurisdiction, procedural compliance, and the application of anti-corruption
... Continue Reading.HON’BLE SUPREME COURT QUASHES FIR AGAINST AUTHORISED AGENT FOR UNAUTHORISED SELLING OF RAILWAY TICKETS
HON’BLE SUPREME COURT QUASHES FIR AGAINST AUTHORISED AGENT FOR UNAUTHORISED SELLING OF RAILWAY TICKETS A two Judge Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court comprising of Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra in the matter of J. Ramesh versus Union of India Criminal Appeal No. 4169/2024 Arising Out Of SLP (Criminal) No. 2408/2017 where
... Continue Reading.Supreme Court: Directors Not Automatically Liable for Corporate Environmental Violations
Supreme Court: Directors Not Automatically Liable for Corporate Environmental Violations A two-Judge Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court comprising Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan issued an order dated 02.01.2025 in the matter of Sanjay Dutt & Ors. v. The State of Haryana & Anr., Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 2025 (@ SLP (Crl)
... Continue Reading.SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT A LIBERATED APPROACH MUST BE TAKEN IN ALLOWING THE RELEASE OF SEIZED VEHICLES IN THE CASES OF NDPS
SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT A LIBERATED APPROACH MUST BE TAKEN IN ALLOWING THE RELEASE OF SEIZED VEHICLES IN THE CASES OF NDPS A two Judge Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court comprising of Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Manmohan passed a judgement dated 07.01.2025 in the matter of Bishwajit Dey V. The State of Assam Criminal
... Continue Reading.Navigating Personality Rights – Does Fame Have a Trade-Off?
Regarding personality rights and introducing a public interest test before granting protection to celebrities, Rebecca Cardoso, in this guest post, advocates for a balanced approach prioritizing protection against genuine harm instead of trivial grievances. Rebecca is a corporate lawyer specializing in financial regulatory practice, with an interest in intellectual property rights. Views expressed here are
... Continue Reading.