Forgiven, Not Forgotten: The Supreme Court’s Directives In A Time-Barred POSH Case To “Haunt Wrongdoer Forever”

Forgiven, Not Forgotten: The Supreme Court’s Directives In A Time-Barred POSH Case To “Haunt Wrongdoer Forever” The present Judgment presents a noteworthy juxtaposition. While the Respondent prevailed in the legal proceedings as the complaint was time-barred, the aforesaid directives issued by the Apex Court could cause lifelong reputational ramifications for the Respondent. In the recent

... Continue Reading.

Compliance With Section 21 Mandatory Before Commencing Arbitral Proceedings After Setting Aside of Arbitral Award

Compliance With Section 21 Mandatory Before Commencing Arbitral Proceedings After Setting Aside of Arbitral Award Setting aside of an arbitral award warrants compliance of Section 21 and commencement of arbitral proceedings afresh and not a resumption of the arbitration proceedings by the same Arbitrator. The Bombay High Court in Harkisandas Tulsidas Pabari & Anr. v.

... Continue Reading.

Why the IBC Bill’s Fix for Waterfall is a Half-Measure?

[Subham Mangla and Dirshi Shah are 4th Year B.A. LL.B (Hons.) and B.B.A LL.B (Hons.) students, respectively, at Gujarat National Law University, Gandhinagar] The order of priority for the distribution of assets during liquidation, colloquially known as the “waterfall mechanism,” is the bedrock of any modern insolvency regime. In India, this critical function is enshrined under section 53 of

... Continue Reading.

Khaitan & Co Advised UltraTech Cement On Offer For Sale Of The India Cements Limited Shares

Khaitan & Co advised UltraTech Cement on Offer for Sale of The India Cements Limited Shares The leading law firm in India, Khaitan & Co advised UltraTech Cement Limited (the “Promoter”) and JM Financial Institutional Securities Limited (Broker) in relation to the sale of 1,82,47,148 equity shares of The India Cements Limited through an Offer

... Continue Reading.