Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas advised Tata Capital Limited and Tata Sons on IPO The leading law firm in India, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas acted as legal counsel to Tata Capital Limited (“Tata Capital”) and Tata Sons Private Limited (“Tata Sons”) on the initial public offering (“IPO”) of equity shares of Tata Capital. The total offer size was
... Continue Reading.Is the Principle of Res Judicata Applicable to Execution Proceedings under Order 21 CPC?
The doctrine of res judicata, embodied in Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), is a cornerstone of Indian procedural law. It bars the re-litigation of matters that have been directly and substantially in issue in a former suit between the same parties and have been finally adjudicated by a competent court.
... Continue Reading.Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Acted As legal Counsel To Cactus Partners Fund I On Its Follow-On Investment In Intangles Lab Private Limited
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas acted as legal counsel to Cactus Partners Fund I on its follow-on investment in Intangles Lab Private Limited The leading law firm in India, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas (CAM) acted as legal counsel to Cactus Partners Fund I on its follow-on investment in Intangles Lab Private Limited. Intangles, a physics-enabled predictive AI platform
... Continue Reading.Trilegal Advised Capri Global On Successful Listing Of NCDs
Trilegal advised Capri Global on successful listing of NCDs The leading law firm in India, Trilegal advised Capri Global on the successful listing of non-convertible debentures (NCDs). This marks the first-ever public debt issuance for Capri Global, a well-diversified, retail-focused, systemically important NBFC offering secured and collateralised loans across MSME, housing, gold, and construction finance
... Continue Reading.Case Summary: Rajendra Singh & Ors. v. State of Uttaranchal (2025) | Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
This case concerns the appeal of three accused—Rajendra Singh (father), Bhupender Singh (son), and Ranjeet Singh (son-in-law)—against their conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (now Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) for the murder of Pushpendra Singh, son of the complainant Diler Singh. The Supreme Court’s judgment, delivered on 7 October
... Continue Reading.Delhi HC Upholds Sanctity of Marriage Over Liberal Divorce Interpretations
In a significant pronouncement reaffirming the sacredness of the marital bond, Delhi High Court in Vivek Nagrath v. Divya Goglani, MAT.APP.(F.C.) 222/2025, dismissed a joint appeal by a couple seeking a declaration that their marriage was void on the ground that essential Hindu marriage ceremonies were not performed. Division Bench of Justice Anil Kshetrapal and
... Continue Reading.Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. Advised Oriental Structural Engineers Private Limited On Divestment To Oriental InfraTrust
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. advised Oriental Structural Engineers Private Limited on divestment to Oriental InfraTrust The leading law firm in India, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. (SAM) acted as legal counsel to Oriental Structural Engineers Private Limited (OSEPL) in connection with its divestment of 100% equity stake in Rajiv – Chowk (Sohna) Highway Private
... Continue Reading.Does Section 438 BNSS Permit a Complainant to File Revision Against a Summoning Order?
The advent of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), which replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), has reignited debates over the scope of revisional powers under the criminal justice system. One critical question concerns whether a complainant can challenge a summoning order through revision under Section 438 BNSS, corresponding to Section 397
... Continue Reading.Merchants to Receive $199.5 Million Settlement from Visa and Mastercard in Ongoing Fraud and Chargeback Case
Merchants to Receive $199.5 Million Settlement from Visa and Mastercard in Ongoing Fraud and Chargeback Case Visa Mastercard Fraud Lawsuit Settlement: $199.5 Million to Compensate Merchants Affected by Chargeback Rules In a significant development, Visa and Mastercard have agreed to pay a combined total of $199.5 million to settle a class action lawsuit that has
... Continue Reading.Supreme Court ruling on Input Tax Credit entitlement for bona fide purchasers in India
Supreme Court ruling on Input Tax Credit entitlement for bona fide purchasers in India Legal precedence for bona fide purchasing dealers to claim ITC when selling dealer defaults In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the right of bona fide purchasing dealers to claim Input Tax Credit, even if the selling
... Continue Reading.