Legal 60

Khaitan & Co advised Galderma Holdings S.A. on securing a John Doe order from Bombay High Court ⁄Khaitan & Co advised Galderma Holdings S.A., acting in India through Galderma India Private Limited (“Galderma”), in securing a John Doe order from the Bombay High Court to counter the increasing sale of counterfeit goods bearing its well-known

Khaitan & Co advised Aaryak Jewellery Private Limited on its Series B round of investment Khaitan & Co advised Aaryak Jewellery Private Limited (doing business as Aukera) in connection with its Series B funding round. The investment round was led by Peak XV Partners Investment VIII and saw participation from Fireside Ventures Investment Fund-III, Eagle

                             It is most vital to note that in a major development with far reaching consequences, the Kerala High Court in a most learned, laudable, landmark, logical and latest judgment titled XXXXX v State of Kerala & anr in Bail Appl. No.

Trilegal Advised Times Internet On Investment By Dream11 Into Cricbuzz And Willow TV Trilegal advised Times Internet Limited (“TIL”) and Times Internet (UK) Limited in connection with the investment made by Sporta Technologies Private Limited (“Dream11”) into the Cricbuzz and Willow businesses, owned and controlled by TIL (“Transaction”). Cricbuzz is one of the leading cricket

                         It would be quite material to note that in a very significant move with far reaching implications, the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court while catching the bull by the horns in a most learned, laudable, landmark, logical and latest judgment titled

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Advised Lati Industria Termoplastici S.p.A. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas advised Lati Industria Termoplastici S.p.A. (“LATI”), a leading European manufacturer of engineering thermoplastics, on a composite transaction along with HEUSSEN Studio Legale e Tributario. The transaction included: (i) The acquisition of the engineering plastic compounds division of Loxim Industries Limited (“Loxim”) by LATI through

       It would be certainly extremely vital to note that in a major development, we see that the Madras High Court in a most learned, laudable, landmark, logical and latest judgment titled P Kishore vs The Secretary to Government and Others in Writ Petition No.143 of 2018 & WMP.Nos.206 & 207 of 2018

In a landmark regulatory reform, the Ministry of Minority Affairs has notified the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025, aiming to bring digital transformation, transparency, and systemic efficiency to the management of Waqf properties across India. These rules have been framed under the authority of Section 108B of the Unified Waqf Management

         It is definitely a matter of great solace to know that none other than the Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati itself in a latest circular – Circular No. 8/2025 dated 05.07.2025 and ROC No.99/SO/2023 has notified with subject titled: “High Court of Andhra Pradesh – Multiple cases registered across different

Supreme Court Judge Justice N. Kotiswar Singh expressed serious concern over the misuse of the POSH Act, 2013, during thelaunch of Delhi High Court’s digital portal for filing workplace sexual harassment complaints. Calling false complaints “dangerous,” he said such actions erode trust in the justice system. Comparing the POSH Act to the Dowry and Domestic