Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas advised Cactus Partners Fund I on Brandworks Technologies Series A Investment The leading Indian law firm Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas acted as legal counsel to Cactus Partners Fund I (as the lead investor) on their Series A investment round in Brandworks Technologies Private Limited, a fast-growing electronics R&D and manufacturing company. The company
... Continue Reading.Khaitan & Co Advised Ashwin Sheth Group On Acquisition Of Development Rights From MHADA
Khaitan & Co advised Ashwin Sheth Group on acquisition of development rights from MHADA The leading Indian law firm Khaitan & Co acted for and advised Ashwin Sheth Group in carrying out title due diligence in relation to their acquisition of development rights from MHADA in respect of land admeasuring 4.05 acres in Goregaon West.
... Continue Reading.Trilegal Advised On RSB Retail India’s IPO, Comprising A Fresh Issue Of INR 5,000 Million And Offer For Sale
Trilegal advised on RSB Retail India’s IPO, comprising a fresh issue of INR 5,000 million and offer for sale The leading Indian law firm Trilegal acted as the legal advisor on Indian law to the book-running lead managers, Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Limited, HDFC Bank Limited, and IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly known as IIFL
... Continue Reading.Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Represented Smith & Nephew Healthcare Private Limited
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas represented Smith & Nephew Healthcare Private Limited The leading Indian law firm Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas represented Smith & Nephew Healthcare Private Limited. Hon’ble CESTAT passed a favorable order confirming the eligibility of the Company for the concessional rate of customs duty on import of implants used for joint replacement and other types
... Continue Reading.Case Summary: Bamadev Panigrahi v. Monorama Raj (1973) | Cinema Equipment as Movable Property
This case concerns a dispute over the ownership and recovery of cinema equipment installed in a touring talkies, as well as whether the plaintiff’s suit for possession (or for recovery of the value) of such equipment was barred by limitation. The crucial legal question revolved around whether the cinema projector, diesel oil engine, and their
... Continue Reading.Can Taking Pictures Alone Constitute Stalking under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?
The offence of stalking, codified under Section 78 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), is a significant provision in Indian criminal law designed to protect women against unwanted pursuit, harassment, and intrusion into their privacy. However, its scope and interpretation continue to raise complex questions. One such issue is whether merely taking photographs of
... Continue Reading.Trilegal Successfully Represented Digital Edge And One Boat In Appeals Before The National Green Tribunal
Trilegal successfully represented Digital Edge and One Boat in appeals before the National Green Tribunal The leading Indian law firm Trilegal successfully represented Digital Edge and One Boat (“Project Proponents”) in appeals challenging the validity of Environmental Clearances (EC) granted to the Project Proponents before the Hon’ble National Green Tribunal and secured a favourable order.
... Continue Reading.Case Summary: Kamal Gupta & Anr. v. M/s L.R. Builders Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (2025) | Limits on Judicial Intervention in Arbitration
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has clarified that non-signatories to an arbitration agreement have no right to attend arbitration proceedings and that courts become functus officio once an arbitrator is appointed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The decision, arising from a family property dispute, sets aside a Delhi
... Continue Reading.Assessing the Viability of Opinion Trading Platforms in India
[Rishi A. Kumar and Zainab Bhanpurawala are fifth-year B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) students at Tamil Nadu National Law University and ILS Law College, Pune, respectively] On April 29, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) published a cautionary press release to investors operating on opinion trading platforms. SEBI stated no investor protection mechanisms will apply, as opinion trading fall
... Continue Reading.Bench and Bot – The Kerala HC’s AI Guidelines and the Bigger Judicial Puzzle
On the Kerala High Court publishing its “Policy Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in District Judiciary“, Shailraj Jhalnia discusses the judicial use of AI in different jurisdictions and the trend of Courts turning to use AI tools. He also discusses the asymmetry in having the guidelines apply only to district courts, and not appellate courts.
... Continue Reading.