Union Budget 2026 from the Prism of Tax Disputes Resolution The Finance Bill of 2026 has set the stage for introducing the simplified new Income Tax Act of 2025. There appears to be a shift in the Taxman’s mindset, which can be seen from the significant rationalization of penalty and prosecution framework under the Income
... Continue Reading.Can Professional Commitments Be a Lawful Justification to Live Apart from a Spouse?
Under Indian matrimonial law, particularly Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the remedy of restitution of conjugal rights is available when one spouse withdraws from the society of the other without a reasonable excuse. However, what qualifies as a “reasonable excuse” has expanded over time to reflect changing societal values, especially concerning women’s
... Continue Reading.Trilegal Advised Körber Group On Acquisition Of 49% Stake In Godrej Körber Supply Chain Limited
Trilegal advised Körber Group on acquisition of 49% stake in Godrej Körber Supply Chain Limited The leading law firm in India, Trilegal advised Körber Group on its acquisition of a 49% equity stake held by Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited in Godrej Körber Supply Chain Limited. Körber Group, an international technology group with global
... Continue Reading.WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT AND ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE RENDER DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST ADVOCATE UNSUSTAINABLE
INTRODUCTIONIn its Judgment dated 29 January 2026, the Supreme Court of India, speaking through a Division Bench comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta, has held that disciplinary proceedings against an advocate cannot be sustained where the complainant has withdrawn the complaint, expressed satisfaction with the advocate’s services and no
... Continue Reading.MENSTRUAL HEALTH RECOGNISED AS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT BY THE SUPREME COURT
INTRODUCTIONIn a significant constitutional adjudication, the Supreme Court of India, by its Judgment dated 20 January 2026, in Dr. Jaya Thakur v. Government of India & Ors., Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1000 of 2022, decisively affirmed that menstrual health and hygiene are integral to the fundamental rights to life, dignity, equality and education. The Judgment
... Continue Reading.SUPREME COURT HOLDS STATE CANNOT DENY REGULARISATION OF LONG-SERVING CONTRACT STAFF APPOINTED ON SANCTIONED POST BY DUE PROCESS
IntroductionIn a decision that fundamentally reshapes the discourse surrounding contractual public sector employment, the Supreme Court of India, through a Judgment delivered by Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta, has pronounced a substantial shift in constitutional jurisprudence. The case is titled Bhola Nath v. The State of Jharkhand and Others (SLP(C) No. 30762 of
... Continue Reading.SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (02.02.2026)
Welcome back to another week of Bells & Whistles. As always, we’ve rounded up a mix of developments, opportunities, and thoughtful reads from across the IP world along with a Bell of the Week that’s well worth revisiting. Bell of the Week “RiP: A Remix Manifesto” Some bells don’t just ring, they remix. This week, we
... Continue Reading.AN ADVOCATE’S MERE PRESENCE OR PROFESSIONAL ADVICE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CRIMINAL INTIMIDATION
INTRODUCTIONIn its Judgment dated 20 January 2026, the Supreme Court of India, speaking through a Division Bench of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale in Beri Manoj v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. (Criminal Appeal arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 14741 of 2025), has reaffirmed that the
... Continue Reading.SpicyIP Weekly Review (January 26 – February 1)
Entering February by announcing the second edition of the SpicyIP Summer School in 2026! A three part book review of “Intellectual Property Debates in South Asia“, edited by Dr. Pratyush Nath Upreti. Case summaries and IP developments from the country and the globe in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review. Anything we are missing out on?
... Continue Reading.Case Summary: XXX v. State of Kerala & Ors. (2026) |Scope and Interpretation of Section 175(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
The Supreme Court in XXX v. State of Kerala & Ors. (2026) delivered a landmark ruling interpreting Section 175(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which introduces procedural safeguards before directing an investigation against public servants. The case arose from allegations of serious sexual offences against police officers and raised important questions regarding the
... Continue Reading.