MV ACT | SUPREME COURT RULES PRIVATE BUS OPERATORS CANNOT PLY ON INTER-STATE ROUTES OVERLAPPING WITH NOTIFIED STATE TRANSPORT ROUTES

IntroductionThe Two Judge Bench of Supreme Court comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih, in the case titled U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Chief General Manager Vs. Kashmiri Lal Batra & Ors. (Civil Appeal No.10522 of 2025) addressed a significant controversy surrounding the grant and countersignature of stage carriage permits for inter-State

... Continue Reading.

SUPREME COURT RULES WRITTEN GROUNDS OF ARREST MUST BE FURNISHED IN LANGUAGE ARRESTEE UNDERSTANDS; OTHERWISE ARREST & REMAND ILLEGAL

IntroductionThe Supreme Court in the case titled Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State Of Maharashtra and Another (Criminal Appeal No.2195 Of 2025), examined whether grounds of arrest must be communicated in writing to comply with Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 47 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. The Division Bench of B.R.

... Continue Reading.

Muslim Man’s Second Marriage Cannot Be Registered Without Hearing First Wife: Kerala High Court

Kerala High Court, in a landmark pronouncement delivered by Justice P. V. Kunhikrishna, held that a Muslim man’s second marriage cannot be registered under the Kerala Registration of Marriages (Common) Rules, 2008 unless the first wife is given an opportunity of hearing. While Muslim personal law permits polygamy in limited circumstances, the Court clarified that

... Continue Reading.

Case Summary: U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Kashmiri Lal Batra & Ors. (2025) | Primacy of State Transport Schemes over Inter-State Agreements

This landmark judgment concerns the complex legal interplay between inter-State transport agreements (IS-RT Agreements) under Section 88 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and notified intra-State routes reserved for State Transport Undertakings (STUs) under Chapter VI of the Act. The appeals arose from conflicting High Court decisions directing the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation

... Continue Reading.

Case Summary: Samiullah v. State of Bihar & Ors. (2025) | Property Registration Cannot Depend on Mutation Records

This landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India addressed a crucial question: whether registration authorities can refuse registration of sale deeds unless the seller produces proof of mutation or “jamabandi” allotment in his name under the Bihar Land Mutation Act, 2011. The Court held that such a requirement was ultra vires the Registration Act,

... Continue Reading.