Linklaters Advised PRIO S.A. on US$700 Million Senior Notes Offering and Any-and-All Cash Tender Offer Linklaters’ team advised PRIO S.A., a leading independent oil and gas company in Brazil, in connection with the issuance of US$700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.750% senior notes due 2030 by PRIO Luxembourg Holding S.à r.l., guaranteed by
... Continue Reading.SpicyIP Weekly Review (November 24-November 30)
India’s first scent trademark has been headline of the week – two posts discussing the development. A critical analysis of the Draft GI Logo Guidelines. And Episode 2 of “Let’s IPsa Loquitur” is up with Sonisha Srinivasan speaking to Dr Zakir Thomas. This and much more in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review. Anything we are
... Continue Reading.Supreme Court Halts Deer Translocation, Emphasises Ecology Over Administrative Ease
In New Delhi Nature Society v. Director Horticulture, DDA & Ors. (2025 INSC 1358), the Supreme Court of India delivered a significant environmental ruling on 26 November 2025, halting further translocation of deer from the historic A.N. Jha Deer Park, Hauz Khas, New Delhi. The judgment, arising out of a public interest petition filed by
... Continue Reading.Does the Law Permit Review of a Court’s Order Appointing an Arbitrator?
Arbitration law in India is founded on the pillars of party autonomy, limited court intervention, procedural certainty, and the swift resolution of disputes. A question, however, that has often generated debate is whether a court, having once appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, can later revisit or review
... Continue Reading.Estrada Doctrine in International Law
State recognition lies at the heart of international relations. Governments rise and fall, revolutions restructure political systems, and sometimes entire regimes collapse overnight. When such changes occur, other states must respond—should they recognise the new authority or refuse to acknowledge it? Historically, the international community oscillated between recognising governments explicitly and withholding recognition as a
... Continue Reading.DHC’s First: Does a Species (Automatically) Anticipate Genus?
Since Novartis v. UOI (2013), a growing litany of cases relating to genus-species patent have been decided by various HCs of the country. Post Novartis, a consistent (and contentious) issue has been whether a later species patent stood disclosed and, thus, priorly claimed in the prior genus patent u/s. 64(1)(a). However, the recent decision of the DHC in FMC Corporation v. Natco raises the inverse issue-
... Continue Reading.SpicyIP Bells & Whistles: IP Events and Opportunities (01.12.2025)
Welcome back to another week of Bells & Whistles! We’re kicking things off with exciting news for the moot community — DPIIT (through CIPAM) has released the International IP Moot Court Funding Guidelines, 2025. This long-awaited framework aims to support Indian teams competing in global IP moots, easing financial hurdles and encouraging broader participation. Thahir
... Continue Reading.WHEN SILENCE BECOMES ERROR: A JUDICIAL REMINDER ON FAIR MATRIMONIAL ADJUDICATION
INTRODUCTIONThe Supreme Court’s Judgment in Dr. Anita v. Indresh Gopal Kohli, Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 24920 of 2019, delivered on 14 November 2025 by Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, revisits core principles governing divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The Court set
... Continue Reading.JUSTICE AGAINST DOUBLE JEOPARDY: THE SUPREME COURT DRAWS A LINE ON ABUSE OF CRIMINAL PROCESS
INTRODUCTIONIn Ranimol & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Anr., Criminal Appeal No. 4931 of 2025 (arising out of SLP (Crl.) 2285/2022), decided on 18 November 2025, the Supreme Court of India—Bench comprising Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma—reaffirmed a vital principle of criminal jurisprudence: the criminal process cannot be manipulated to repeatedly
... Continue Reading.WHEN VIGILANCE FADES: A JUDICIAL TREATISE ON DUTY, DELAY AND EXECUTION SALE
INTRODUCTIONThe Supreme Court’s decision in G.R. Selvaraj (Dead) through LRs. v. K.J. Prakash Kumar & Ors., 2025 INSC 1353, delivered on 25 November 2025 by Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice Alok Aradhe, offers a detailed examination of the limits of judicial intervention in execution proceedings—particularly the effect of Order XXI Rule 90(3) of the Code
... Continue Reading.