Skip to content
  • Home
  • Government
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • PIL
  • RTI
  • International
  • Law Firms
  • Law Schools
  • Other Courts
  • Parliament
  • Tribunals

Legal 60

Law News Aggregator

NLAT plot keeps thickening: Ex-VC Venkata Rao challenges ‘exclusion island’ NLSIU in SC writ

Posted on September 8, 2020 By Legal 60

 •  •  Dark Mode

Your Interests & Preferences

I am a…

law firm lawyer

in-house company lawyer

litigation lawyer

law student

aspiring student

other

Website Look & Feel

 •  •  Dark Mode

Blog Layout


Save preferences

By Legally India

Tuesday, 08 September 2020 13:55
Law schools

Just when you thought the twists and turns in the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) and NLSIU Bangalore saga could not get any more dramatic, the predecessor of current NLSIU Bangalore vice-chancellor (VC) Prof Sudhir Krishnaswamy, Prof Venkata Rao, has filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court against the institution he used to head on a plethora of grounds, according to LiveLaw and Bar & Bench.

Rao filed the petition against the National Law Aptitude Test (NLAT) jointly with Rakesh Kumar Agarwalla, the parent of a candidate, via advocates Sughosh Subramanyam and Vipin Nair. The petition in the apex court follows at least one high court petition (in Jharkhand) challenging the NLAT.

He alleged that NLS’ decision to hold its separate entrance test was “unilateral” and the petition is strong on historical Law School rhetoric, noting, according to LiveLaw:

Ostensibly it appears that the sole aim of the Respondent No. 2 [NLSIU VC Prof. [Dr.] Sudhir Krishnaswamy] is to turn the Respondent No. 1 [NLSIU] from an island of excellence to an island of exclusion

The petition, a full copy of which is viewable here, accuses NLSIU of:

  • violating the bylaws of the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) consortium by spinning up its own exam,
  • that home proctored tests were prone to being cheated on,
  • not giving sufficient notice to candidates of the exam, which is scheduled for 12 September, with mocks scheduled between tomorrow and 11 September.

To be updated.

Click to show comments
at your own risk
(alt+c)

By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click ‘Report to LI’ below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.

‘); $(‘#giphyin’).blur(function(){giphy(0, false);});
}
//–>

‘); $(‘.artid’ + artid).attr(‘style’,’opacity:.5′); } }); } } }); $.post( “https://www.legallyindia.com/cli/article_hits.php”, { type:’article’, id:’11627′ }) .done(function( data ) { }); console.log(‘ready’); var preftype = localStorage[‘lipreftype’]; var loc = location.href.replace(‘https://www.legallyindia.com’,”); });

Read More

Post navigation

ICICI Bank-Videocon case: ED arrests Deepak Kochhar on money laundering charges
K-RERA to penalise realtors/builders for not filing project updates

Ads




Facebook

Law in 60

Instagram

[instagram-feed]

Ads




Find The News

From The Past

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Government
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • PIL
  • RTI
  • International
  • Law Firms
  • Law Schools
  • Other Courts
  • Parliament
  • Tribunals

About Law in 60

Law in 60 is a first of it’s kind effort to provide legal news, updates and happenings from in and around India but without the long drawn stories. The legal industry is known for expansive analysis, opinions and lengthy writings running into pages – be it an article, judgement, commentary or a simple news report: Law in 60 aims to change that by providing reports and updates from various areas of law and relevant happenings but in 60 words or less, so you only spend 60 seconds or less.

Pingraphy powered by WordPress
  • Home
  • About
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Internships
  • Legal