[Bhavin Patel is a Programme Director and Natasha Aggarwal a Senior Research Fellow at TrustBridge Rule of Law Foundation] On 3 July 2025, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) issued an ex-parte interim order against the Jane Street group. The order asserted that Jane Street employed manipulative strategies (intraday index manipulation and extended marking-the-close) on the NIFTY and BANKNIFTY
... Continue Reading.Category: Uncategorized
Decoding RBI’s Overhaul of the Payment Aggregator Directions
[Manas Divetia is a IV year B.B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) student at Gujarat National Law University, Gandhinagar] The Reserve Bank of India’s (“RBI”) 2025 Master Direction on Regulation of Payment Aggregators dated 15 September 2025 consolidates and replaces the fragmented 2020 framework, aligning online, physical point‑of‑sale, and cross‑border aggregation under a single, enforceable code that hardwires escrow architecture, KYC, cyber resilience, and FEMA‑compliant cross‑border
... Continue Reading.Why the IBC Bill’s Fix for Waterfall is a Half-Measure?
[Subham Mangla and Dirshi Shah are 4th Year B.A. LL.B (Hons.) and B.B.A LL.B (Hons.) students, respectively, at Gujarat National Law University, Gandhinagar] The order of priority for the distribution of assets during liquidation, colloquially known as the “waterfall mechanism,” is the bedrock of any modern insolvency regime. In India, this critical function is enshrined under section 53 of
... Continue Reading.Third-Party Funding as Catalyst for Effective Avoidance Recoveries under IBC
[Naman Aggarwal is a 5th year B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) student at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow] The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) has transformed India’s legal regime on addressing corporate distress by prioritising timely revival, value maximisation and fairness to creditors. Since its introduction, the IBC has effected the resolution of stressed assets
... Continue Reading.Recent FCPA Policy Changes in the US: Implications for Indian Businesses
[Kartikey Mahajan is a Partner, Bhavya Chengappa a Principal Associate, and Rohan Sanjith a Paralegal, all at Khaitan & Co.] The landscape of U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) enforcement has fundamentally shifted in 2025, as the US Department of Justice (DOJ) implements sweeping policy changes that prioritize American economic interests while refocusing anti-corruption efforts on transnational criminal organizations. These
... Continue Reading.BETWEEN INTIMACY AND ALLEGATION: THE SUPREME COURT ON QUASHING FIRs IN CASES OF PROMISE OF MARRIAGE
INTRODUCTIONThe Supreme Court of India in the case of Surendra Khawse v. State of Madhya Pradesh &Anr., {SLP(Crl.) No. 3361 of 2025}, delivered its Judgment on 22nd September 2025. TheBench comprised Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh. Thecase examined the delicate intersection of consensual intimacy, allegations of rape on thepretext of marriage and
... Continue Reading.JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE AND ACCOUNTABILITY: SUPREME COURT’S REBUKE ON IMPROPER SURRENDER OF JURISDICTION
INTRODUCTIONThe Supreme Court of India in Shiv Kumar Shaw Anr. v. Rekha Shaw(Diary No. 45777/2024) (arising out of Crl.A. No. 2842/2023), passed its Orderon 26 September 2025. The Bench consisted of Justice Pankaj Mithal andJustice Prasanna B. Varale. The case revolved around the unusual conduct ofa Trial Court Judge who, unable to decide a matter
... Continue Reading.Supreme Court Upholds the Sanctity of Commercial Contracts
In a recent judgement passed by the Supreme Court of India titled SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation v. GMR Kamalanga Energy Ltd., (Citation: 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2088 (or 2025 INSC 1171).) the Supreme Court, hearing an appeal against the Orissa High Court’s Division Bench judgment, upheld the High Court’s decision to set aside the
... Continue Reading.HIGH COURTS SHOULD DISCOURAGE DIRECT FILING OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL PLEAS, ASK PARTIES TO APPROACH SESSIONS COURT FIRST: SUPREME COURT
IntroductionThe Supreme Court of India’s recent decision in Jagdeo Prasad v. State ofBihar (SLP (Crl.) No.17805 of 2024) has reinforced judicial principles governinganticipatory bail applications, particularly in cases involving serious criminal charges.Decided on September 17, 2025, by the Division Bench of Justices Vikram Nath andSandeep Mehta, this Judgment addresses critical issues surrounding the misuse ofanticipatory bail provisions
... Continue Reading.SUPREME COURT RULES TRIAL COURTS CANNOT ADD CHARGES SOLELY BASED ON PRIVATE AFFIDAVITS WITHOUT INVESTIGATION
IntroductionIn a significant Judgment that reinforces the principle of procedural fairness incriminal trials, the Supreme Court of India in Deepak Yadav and Another versusState of Uttar Pradesh and Another [SLP (Crl.) No.6904 of 2025] addressed acritical question regarding the powers of Trial Courts to take cognizance of additionalcharges based on private affidavits.The Allahabad High Court had upheld
... Continue Reading.