The Supreme Court of India, in a recent decision addressed a challenging question of criminal jurisprudence concerning the sufficiency of evidence required to sustain a conviction for murder. The Appeal titled Govind v. State of Haryana (Criminal Appeal No. 5641 of 2024) was filed against conviction by the Trial Court and subsequent affirmation by the
... Continue Reading.Category: Uncategorized
SUPREME COURT HOLDS PENDENCY OF WRIT PROCEEDINGS NO GROUND TO NOT AVAIL ALTERNATIVE STATUTORY REMEDIES
The Supreme Court of India recently delivered a significant Judgment in Civil Appeal No. 2322 of 2013 titled Kolanjiammal (D) Thr Lrs. v. The Revenue Divisional Officer Perambalur District & Ors. The Court addressed critical issues concerning the scope of statutory remedies available under the Tamil Nadu Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 and the intersection between
... Continue Reading.150 Days to Resolution or Liquidation? The Problems and Possibilities of a Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process
[Saksham Agrawal is a third-year B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) student at National Law School of India University, Bangalore] The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (“the Code”) was enacted to consolidate India’s fragmented insolvency framework and shift the philosophy of insolvency from litigation and recovery to collective resolution and value maximisation. Since its enactment, the Code has been
... Continue Reading.Unlocking the Green Channel: The Case Against CCI’s Strictness
[Siddharth Sharma and Aarushi Mittal are 4th year law students at National Law University Odisha, Cuttack] More than six years ago, the Competition Commission of India (“CCI”) introduced the Green Channel route (“GCR”) for approval of combinations under the CCI (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to combinations) Regulations, 2011 to enable automatic approval for combinations that did not involve any
... Continue Reading.Fast-Track Mergers Reimagined: The 2025 MCA Amendment
[Arjun Chaudhary is a 4th year BBA. LLB. (Hons.) student at Gujarat National Law University] The fast-track merger route under section 233 of the Companies Act, 2013 was originally designed as a narrow mechanism to simplify mergers between small companies and between holding companies and their wholly owned subsidiaries. The objective was to remove such schemes from the
... Continue Reading.MV ACT | SUPREME COURT RULES PRIVATE BUS OPERATORS CANNOT PLY ON INTER-STATE ROUTES OVERLAPPING WITH NOTIFIED STATE TRANSPORT ROUTES
IntroductionThe Two Judge Bench of Supreme Court comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih, in the case titled U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Chief General Manager Vs. Kashmiri Lal Batra & Ors. (Civil Appeal No.10522 of 2025) addressed a significant controversy surrounding the grant and countersignature of stage carriage permits for inter-State
... Continue Reading.SUPREME COURT RULES WRITTEN GROUNDS OF ARREST MUST BE FURNISHED IN LANGUAGE ARRESTEE UNDERSTANDS; OTHERWISE ARREST & REMAND ILLEGAL
IntroductionThe Supreme Court in the case titled Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State Of Maharashtra and Another (Criminal Appeal No.2195 Of 2025), examined whether grounds of arrest must be communicated in writing to comply with Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 47 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. The Division Bench of B.R.
... Continue Reading.THE SEVEN-YEAR SILENCE: WHEN PRESUMPTION OF DEATH MEETS COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT
In The Commissioner, Nagpur Municipal Corporation & Ors. v. Lalita & Ors., 2025 INSC 1280, a Division Bench of the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice Prasanna B. Varale, delivered a significant ruling on 29 October 2025, clarifying the law surrounding civil death, presumption of death under Section 108 of the
... Continue Reading.ECHOES BEYOND THE GRAVE: WHEN DEAD LITIGANTS NULLIFY JUSTICE INTRODUCTION
In Vikram Bhalchandra Ghongade v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors., 2025 INSC 1283, the Supreme Court of India, through a Bench comprising Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Atul S. Chandurkar, examined a striking question of civil procedural law — whether a decree passed in favour of deceased appellants, without substitution of legal heirs, holds
... Continue Reading.THE CLOUDED WILL: WHEN POSSESSION PREVAILS OVER PAPER OWNERSHIP
In S. Santhana Lakshmi & Ors. v. D. Rajammal, 2025 INSC 1197, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice K. Vinod Chandran, delivered a nuanced judgment on 7 October 2025, exploring the interplay between title, possession and injunction relief under property law. The Court examined whether a plaintiff can successfully seek
... Continue Reading.