Limitation Period Linked to Identification of Offender, Not Filing of Complaint

The law of limitation in criminal proceedings ensures that prosecutions are initiated within a reasonable time so that evidence remains reliable and accused persons are not subjected to indefinite uncertainty. However, determining the starting point of limitation often raises complex legal questions, particularly where the offence is discovered first, and the identity of the offender

... Continue Reading.

LEASE, NOT LICENCE: SUPREME COURT RESTORES A 99-YEAR DEMISE AND REAFFIRMS SANCTITY OF REGISTERED CONVEYANCES

INTRODUCTIONIn The General Secretary, Vivekananda Kendra v. Pradeep Kumar Agarwalla & Others, reported as 2026 INSC 199, decided on 26 February 2026, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice S.V.N. Bhatti, set aside the Judgment of the Orissa High Court and restored the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and First

... Continue Reading.

ONE DEBT, MANY DOORS: SUPREME COURT SETTLES THE LAW ON SIMULTANEOUS INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PRINCIPAL DEBTOR AND GUARANTOR

INTRODUCTIONIn ICICI Bank Limited v. ERA Infrastructure (India) Limited & Ors. and connected matters, 2026 INSC 201, decided on 26 February 2026, the Supreme Court of India, speaking through Justice Dipankar Datta, conclusively held that simultaneous insolvency proceedings under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) can be initiated against both a

... Continue Reading.

OCULAR EVIDENCE PREVAILS: SUPREME COURT AFFIRMS CONVICTION DESPITE NON-RECOVERY OF WEAPONS AND GENERAL SECTION 313 QUESTIONS

INTRODUCTIONIn Ghanshyam Mandal & Ors. v. State of Bihar (now Jharkhand), 2026 INSC 194, decided on 25 February 2026, the Supreme Court of India, in a Judgment authored by Justice Atul S. Chandurkar and concurred by Justice J.K. Maheshwari, dismissed the Criminal Appeal challenging conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian

... Continue Reading.

Kwality Wall’s (India) Limited – Demerger Of Its Ice Cream business From Hindustan Unilever Limited

Kwality Wall’s (India) Limited – Demerger of its Ice Cream business from Hindustan Unilever Limited The leading Indian law firm, Khaitan & Co advised Kwality Walls (India) Limited (KWIL) on the demerger of the ice cream business of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) into KWIL and, subsequently, on the preparation and filing of the Information Memorandum

... Continue Reading.

Donovan & Ho Welcomes Hooi Chung Wai As Partner In Dispute Resolution

Donovan & Ho Welcomes Hooi Chung Wai as Partner in Dispute Resolution The young and vibrant Malaysian law firm, Donovan & Ho, has appointed Hooi Chung Wai as a Partner in its Dispute Resolution practice, further strengthening the firm’s capabilities in high-stakes corporate and commercial litigation. Chung Wai brings extensive experience in shareholder and corporate

... Continue Reading.

TCS urging staff to use AI despite risk to revenue

TCS urging staff to use AI despite risk to revenue TCS’ stance mirrors that of smaller rival Wipro, which expects rapid AI adoption to boost rather than shrink demand for software service providers Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) is urging employees to use artificial intelligence tools to deliver work faster and cheaper, even if it eats

... Continue Reading.

Khaitan & Co Advised Ambuja Housing And Urban Infrastructure Company Limited On The Park Unizen Development Project

Khaitan & Co advised Ambuja Housing and Urban Infrastructure Company Limited on The Park Unizen Development Project The leading Indian law firm, Khaitan & Co acted as legal advisor to Ambuja Housing and Urban Infrastructure Company Limited in relation to the regulatory and RERA-compliant structuring of its real estate development project, The Park Unizen. The

... Continue Reading.