Author: Legal 60

🏢 Company: R.K. Dewan 📍 Location: Mumbai 💰 Stipend/Salary: As Per Industry standard About the Job :R.K. Dewan Legal Services, is currently accepting resumes from final year law students, for an internship opportunity as well as for Jr. Associate roles. This opportunity shall be with the Mumbai Litigation department. Eligibility :(i) Candidate should have the

The Supreme Court examined whether stamp duty on a mining lease should be calculated based on the fixed dead rent or the anticipated royalty likely to be payable from mineral extraction. The Court held that anticipated royalty is the appropriate basis where the value of the lease is indeterminate at the time of execution, and

Stepping into August with posts on the DHC’s order in ANI v. OpenAI, Interdigital v Transsion, the Ribociclib saga, and digital archive. This and much more in this week’s SpicyIP Weekly Review. Anything we are missing out on? Drop a comment and let us know. Highlights of the Week ANI v. OpenAI: User Rights, Fair

🏢 Company: SHS Chambers 📍 Location: 5A, Bakhtwawar, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 21 💰 Stipend/Salary: Rs. 30 to 36 Lakhs per annum About the Job :SHS Chambers is a full-service law chamber spanning litigation, dispute resolution, and non-litigation work, built on trust, continuity, and careful stewardship of every matter it undertakes. Operating as an integrated

Introduction  The Delhi High Court (“DHC”), on 4th May 2026 in Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v. Tech Square Engineering Pvt. Ltd., overturned a Single Judge judgment (2023) and granted the mark “ALPHARD” well-known status while affirming its trans-border reputation. The judgment is noteworthy as it has articulated a test for trans-border reputation and has also observed

                                                             “Saw in dream today saying to CJI: Mi Lord why a High Court Bench cannot be ever created in Ayodhya? Mi Lord says that it

                                                   It is definitely most significant to pay our utmost unremitting attention especially those who themselves convert to other religion that in a major development directly affecting those who convert, we

                                                        It is quite significant to note that in a major development we see that the Chhattisgarh High Court in a most learned, laudable, landmark, logical and latest judgment titled State of Chhattisgarh vs Mohd Seraj in Case No.: ACQA

For years, Section 92 and 100 levers have occupied a central place in discussions on improving access to patented medicines in India. Yet, despite repeated calls for their use, the mechanism has remained almost entirely dormant. This 2-part post by Rishabh Upadhyay explains that the ongoing Ribociclib litigation before the Kerala High Court offers an

Continuing from Part I, Rishabh Upadhyay explains that making a patented medicine free on paper does not necessarily make it accessible in practice. Through Rajasthan’s procurement and distribution model for Ribociclib, he argues that India’s access-to-medicines challenge is ultimately an infrastructural one, not merely a patent-law problem. Rishabh is an LL.M. candidate at South Asian