Author: Legal 60

                                                                                    While taking a very stern view of scandalous remarks made about the judiciary without having any valid proof, the Delhi High Court in a most learned, laudable, landmark, logical and latest judgment titled Court On Its Own Motion Vs Shiv Narayan Sharma Adv and Ors in CONT.CAS.(CRL) 3/2025 & CRL.M.A. 1909/2026, CRL.M.A. 2184/2026, CRL.M.A.

The Centre for Studies in International Trade and Investment Laws (CITIL) at Dharmashastra National Law University (DNLU), Jabalpur successfully concluded its two-day International Symposium on “Carbon Governance and Global Justice: Reconciling Trade Competitiveness and Climate Responsibility”, held from April 24–25, 2026. Organized in collaboration with the WTO Chairs Programme (India Chair), Centre for Trade and

                                                                                 While coming out most openly and vehemently in support of innocent citizens, we see that none other than the Supreme Court in a most learned, laudable, landmark, logical and latest judgment titled The Secretary, Govt of Tamil Nadu and others vs S Raja and Others Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 24430-24431 of 2019 and cited in

                                                                               It is definitely entirely in the fitness of things that the Madurai Division Bench of the Madras High Court in a most learned, laudable, landmark, logical and latest judgment titled State vs M in  R.T.(MD).No.02 of 2026 and Crl.A.(MD).No.425 of 2026 that was pronounced just recently on 07.04.2026 while noting that spending the remainder

A very happy World IP Day to our readers! As the IPL frenzy returns, so does the battle for consumer attention, this time fought as much through witty notifications and real-time campaigns as on the cricket field, and raising familiar questions about the legality and limits of ambush marketing. In this post, Anooja Padhee and

National Capital Law Journal is a blind peer-reviewed Journal published annually by the Law Centre II, University of Delhi, Delhi since 1996 with the objective of promoting academic research and fostering debate on contemporary legal issues in India. It is not restricted to any particular field of law, and includes legal as well as policy

The Goa Judicial Services Examination is conducted under the supervision of the High Court of Bombay at Goa for the recruitment of Civil Judge Junior Division (CJJD) and Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC). It is one of the most competitive state judiciary exams, offering an opportunity to enter the judicial services in Goa. Eligibility Criteria

The Supreme Court of India, in its recent judgment in V.K. John v. S. Mukanchand Bothra and HUF (Died), represented by LRs. & Others (2026 INSC 393), clarified that a challenge to an arbitral award by legal representatives must be pursued under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court made it

In a significant ruling on the enforcement of foreign judgments, the Supreme Court of India in Messer Griesheim GmbH v. Goyal MG Gases Pvt. Ltd. (2026) has reaffirmed that a foreign judgment rendered without a full and fair trial, particularly in summary proceedings where triable issues exist, cannot be enforced in India under Section 13

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant 2026 judgment, has clarified an important aspect of arbitration law, whether the use of permissive language like “can” in a dispute resolution clause creates a binding arbitration agreement. The ruling in Nagreeeka Indcon Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Cargocare Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2026 INSC 384) reinforces a