The article highlights the crucial significance of international law as a cornerstone in the global campaign against genocide. Crucial Cross Roads: International Law in the Battle against Genocidal Acts As per General Assembly Resolution 96 (I) genocide is the denial of the right of existence of an entire human group as homicide is the denial
... Continue Reading.
In response to a series of unstarred questions regarding copyright infringement by generative AI, directed towards the Minister of Commerce and Industry, Union Minister of State for Commerce and Industry, Shri. Som Parkash, the Minister clarified that the existing IPR regime is well-equipped to protect Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated works, thus indicating no necessity to establish
... Continue Reading.SUPREME COURT ALLOWS INTEREST FOR DELAY IN REFUND OF DUTY DRAWBACK TO THE RESPONDENT A two Judge Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court comprising of Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan passed a Judgment dated 05-02-2024 in the matter of Union of India and Ors. vs M/S. B. T. Patil and Sons Belgaum
... Continue Reading.SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS COMPENSATION AWARDED TO MAN WHO LOST VISION DUE TO MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE A two-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice B. R. Gavai and Justice Sandeep Mehta passed a Judgment dated 29-01-2024 in the matter of P. C Jain vs. Dr. R. P. Singh Special Leave Petition (Civil) No(s). 683-685 of
... Continue Reading.SUPREME COURT CONVICTS ADVOCATE FOR CONTEMPT AND REJECTS HIS APOLOGY A two Judge Bench of Supreme Court comprising of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, passed a judgement dated 30.01.2024 in Gulshan Bajwa v. Registrar, High Court of Delhi & Anr. Cr. Appeal No. 577/2007 wherein the Apex Court held that in a
... Continue Reading.SUPREME COURT HOLDS VACATION OF STAY ORDER IN CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS IS IMPROPER A two-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice Aniruddh Bose and Justice Sanjay Kumar passed a Judgement dated 30-01-2024 in the matter of Amit Kumar Das, Joint Secretary, Baitanik, a Registered Society. vs. Shrimati Hutheesingh Tagore Charitable Respondent in Special Leave
... Continue Reading.SUPREME COURT ACQUITS THE ACCUSED IN WRONGFUL CONVICTION FOR UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY INTRODUCTION A two-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan passed an Order dated 07.02.2024 in Criminal Appeal No. 1465 Of 2011 in Kishore & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab and set aside the Order of
... Continue Reading.
Image accessed from here In Priya Randolph v. Deputy Controller, Madras High court rejected the contention that the subject invention was excluded for being business method. The findings of this short judgement have possible significant implications on the jurisprudence regarding 3(k) and business methods in the Patent Act. The judgement comes on the heels of OpenTV v.
... Continue Reading.
The case of Ravinder Kaur Grewal & Ors. v. Manjeet Kaur & Ors. (2019), pertains to the legal principle of “adverse possession” as outlined in the Limitation Act. Particularly, it examines Article 65 of the Act, which establishes a 12-year time frame for the “possession of immovable property or any interest therein based on title.”
... Continue Reading.
DIGITAL PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT, 2023 The current Act is more open–ended, leaving much to be prescribed by the Central Government and it does away with different categories of datasets (like critical or sensitive data). The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (“DPDP Act, 2023” or “the Act”) provides a legal framework for the processing
... Continue Reading.