Month: July 2022

Navayuga Group sells stake in Navayuga Quazigund Expressway Private Limited to NIIF under the guidance of Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. advised Navayuga Group for sale of their stake in Navayuga Quazigund Expressway Private Limited (“Company”) to National Investment and Infrastructure Fund (“NIIF”). The Company is engaged in designing, rehabilitation,

Continuing on from the previous blogpost, we bring you part 2 of Amit Tailor’s two part series on the recent case Nippon A&L vs The Controller of Patents, which looked into questions of how and to what extent a claim in a patent application can be amended under the Patents Act. In the first part,

Madras High Court orders police to probe a fraudulent appointment Directs the department to file a status report after investigation The Madras High Court has directed the jurisdictional police to register a criminal case and proceed in accordance with the law in a matter pertaining to a fraudulent appointment to the post of the operator

Business efficacy test cannot be applied to alter the express terms of agreement: Delhi High Court The bench set aside the arbitral tribunal’s award and allowed the challenge petition The High Court of Delhi has held that the arbitrator cannot alter the express terms of the agreement by applying the business efficacy test when there

We’re pleased to bring to our readers a 2 part post by Amit Tailor on the recent case Nippon A&L vs The Controller of Patents, which looked into questions of how and to what extent a claim in a patent application can be amended under the Patents Act. In the first part, Amit introduces the

Last Updated on 2 hours by Admin LB Question:  A is charged and tried for the offence of ‘criminal (dishonest) misappropriation’ and convicted. He files an appeal under Section 386 (b) (ii), Cr.P.C. against the judgment of conviction passed by the trial court. On appeal, the appellate court alters the finding in regard to the

Tribunal has power recall its order, if party plays fraud: Gujarat High Court “No court or tribunal can be regarded as powerless to recall its own order if it is convinced that the order was wangled through fraud or misrepresentation of such a dimension as would affect the very basis of the claim.” In an

Baljit Singh Kalha joins Stashfin as a General Counsel He was earlier a senior partner at the law firm Titus and Co Singapore-based neo-banking startup Stashfin has made a key addition to its leadership team with Baljit Singh Kalha joining as a General Counsel. Tushar Aggarwal, the CEO and founder of Stashfin, said, “We are

Mayer Brown advises British Land on the sale of its assets to GIC The transaction establishes a new joint-venture with an ownership split of 75:25 between the two entities Global law firm Mayer Brown has advised British Land, one of the largest property development and investment companies in the UK, on the sale of the

Last Updated on 2 hours by Admin LB Question: X is tried and convicted by a court of session under Section 376 I.P.C. for the offence of rape. X prefers an appeal in the High Court against the order of conviction passed by the Sessions Judge. On appeal, the High Court is satisfied that there