Month: January 2022

                  It is quite significant from all angles to note that the Apex Court has as recently as on January 25, 2022 in a brief, brilliant and balanced judgment titled Joseph Stephen vs Santhanasamy in 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 83 and in Criminal Appeal Nos. 90-93 of 2022

While fully, finally and firmly endorsing gender equality, the Chhattisgarh High Court recently on January 25 in Mamni Pradhan vs South Eastern Coalfields Ltd & Ors in 2022 LiveLaw (Chh) 8 : Writ Petition (S) No. 4712 of 2018 held that a clause in an agreement under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which only entitled a

Last Updated on 2 hours by Admin LB Introduction The Law Commission of India is an executive which is neither statutory nor a constitutional body entrusted with the responsibility to bring legal reforms in the country and suggest recommendations accordingly. Constitution of the Law Commission of India (Pre-Independence Era) The Law Commission is established by

While spelling out the correct legal position, the Karnataka High Court has in a learned, laudable, landmark and latest judgment titled Virendra Khanna vs State of Karnataka in Writ Petition No. 1983 of 2021 and 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 27, said in no uncertain terms that further investigation conducted under Section 173(8) of CrPC must always

Last Updated on 51 mins by Admin LB IMS Law College is organising an International Webinar on Basics of Linguistics on 8th February 2022. About the organizer/college/university IMS Law College, Noida which was established in 2004, is the first law college in Gautam Buddha Nagar to have started B.A., LL.B. 5-year degree programme. The college

Earlier Posts: Summary and Analysis I Is it mandatory to be a member of copyright society to carry out the business of issuing or granting licences in respect of literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works incorporated in a cinematograph film or sound recordings? I am of the view that the copyright framework gives authors and

On Saturday, The Kerala High Court held that the prosecution of a case has every right to ask that the accused surrender their mobile phones for the forensic examination under Section 79A of the Information Technology Act. The Court had rejected the argument saying that the surrender of mobile phones would infringe the fundamental right

A bench that comprised of Justice AS Oka and Justice Ajay Rastogi was looking after a case in which the issue pertained to whether the Delhi High Court, as in its original civil jurisdiction, was competent enough to help execute a particular foreign decree under the Section 44A of the Civil Procedure Code. At the

The Single bench of Justice, Nandita Dubey held that every citizen of our country who has reached the majority has the freedom to live her or his life as she or he desires, as per the Indian Constitution. In the instant case (Guljar Khan v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others) a writ petition by