Month: November 2020

In a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Shaurya Gautam (Minor) and another vs. State of UP and 4 others in Habeas Corpus Petition No. 140 of 2020 delivered on November 10, 2020, the Allahabad High Court refused to grant the custody of two minor children to their father, who is accused of killing his

Today, the Supreme Court has refused to lift the stay granted by the Civil Court and the Telangana High Court against the movie ‘Jhund’ starring Amitabh Bachchan which will not be released for the time. A three-judge Bench of Chief Justice of India, SA Bobde dismissed the appeal by producer of the movie, Super Cassettes challenging an October 19 order of the Telangana High Court restraining the

Hard work ahead for first years Albeit with significant delays, national law universities (NLUs) have started their first batches of the five-year LLB programmes with many hoping to catch up on the lost time due to the delayed Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) admissions by working through the first semester holidays. We have contacted a

Before the Delhi High Court, the State Govt. has asserted that a personal vehicle is not a private zone and any person in it must wear a mask compulsorily. The statement was madeafter the petition was filed by an advocate seeking compensation of Rs 10 lakh after he was fined Rs 500 for not wearing a mask while driving. With regard to

In a reasonable, recent, remarkable and righteous judgment titled Rohit Sharma vs. State of Himachal Pradesh in Cr.MP(M) No. 2001 of 2020 delivered as recently as on November 11, 2020, the Himachal Pradesh High Court has granted bail to a man accused of ‘raping’ a minor girl on the ground that the girl had consented

Federation of Indian Animals Protection Organisations (FIAPO) has informed the High Court of Delhi by submitting that the Zoological Authority of India is not administering proper care or monitoring the animals kept in captivity or in circus. An NGO vocal for animal rights stated that of all the 29 circuses in India, only one is

In the Supreme Court of India (2012) 5 SCC 661 Appellant Aneeta Hada Respondent Godfather Travels & Tours pvt. ltd. Date of Judgement 27th April, 2012 Bench Hon’ble Justice Dalveer Bhandari, Justice Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, Justice Dipak Misra Introduction: Because of the similarity between the controversy, the two appeals of 838 and 842 of 2008,

It cannot be denied that if Arnab Goswami was able to step freely out of prison after 8 days, it is only and only because of the Bench of Justice Dr DY Chandrachud and Justice Indira Banerjee of Apex Court who were listening his interim bail plea along with three others! The Apex Court order

It is quite refreshing, reassuring and remarkable that in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled The Telangana Fire Works Dealers Association vs. P Indra Prakash & Ors in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary Nos. 24650/2020 delivered on November 13, 2020 has modified the order of the Telangana High Court which imposed a complete and

The Supreme Court bench of Justice UU lalit and Justice MM Shantanagoudarupheld that the UP government’s decision about increasing cut-off marks for 2019 recruitment of 69,000 Shiksha Mitras (assistant teachers) to 65 and 60 for the general and reserved categories respectively. The SC further confirmed the Allahabad High Court judgment in this regard and dismissed the appeals filed by Uttar Pradesh Prathmik Shiksha Mitra Association allowing to the UP government to fill the 37,000 Shiksha Mitra vacancies in